Re: Lazy printing in tabulated-list-mode

[Stefan Monnier]

> Secondly, how do you see the running time on the profiler?

Supposedly, we have one sample per ms (given the default
profiler-sample-interval), so the 1.3s comes from the total number
of samples.  I'm not actually sure this is accurate.

> 0.6s per print is less than the "couple of seconds" I reported
> earlier, because that was without byte-compiling.  Still, I think it's
> something we can optimize because the benchmark reports 67% of the
> time was spent garbage collecting.

Right, 0.6s is not unbearable, but it's borderline, and there should be
optimization opportunities.


        Stefan