[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 255a011: Add `save-mark-and-excursion', which h

From: Nicolas Petton
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 255a011: Add `save-mark-and-excursion', which has the old `save-excursion' behavior
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 20:31:12 +0200

Stefan Monnier writes:

>>>> +      (setf nmark (marker-position saved-mark))
>>> ^^^^
>>> Old habits die hard.
>> Should `setf' be avoided?  Is it only when `setq' would do instead?
> Sorry, I guess `setf' work as well, here.  I've just been bitten by
> bootstrapping problems too many times, but simple.el should be late
> enough that it can't be a problem.

Ok, thanks for the clarification.

Nicolas Petton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]