[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 387e1e1: New version of `seq-let' based on a pc
|
From: |
Nicolas Petton |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 387e1e1: New version of `seq-let' based on a pcase pattern |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 May 2015 23:35:01 +0200 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> Why wouldn't
>
> `(app (seq--nested-elt ',(reverse (cons index nested-indexes))) ,name)
>
> work as well? Or, once you get rid of the nested case,
>
> `(app (seq-elt ,index) ,name)
Wouldn't that result in passing the sequence as the second argument of
`seq-elt'? That was the reason why I added this reversed arguments.
Cheers,
Nico
--
Nicolas Petton
http://nicolas-petton.fr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature