[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like? |
Date: |
Fri, 29 May 2015 22:44:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
chad <address@hidden> writes:
>> On 27 May 2015, at 07:25, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
>> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
>> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>>
>>> There is a difference for android devices, not really for iOS, but
>>> it doesnt matter, since I’m not talking about either one.
>>
>> I was talking about iThings specifically, so it looks like we
>> were talking about different things.
>
> We really, really arent. The link I sent you describes how to
> install software that you write on a non-jailbroken, non-rooted,
> fresh-from-the-store iOS device without having ever purchased an
> enrollment in the iOS Developer Program.
No it doesn't. The link[1] you sent explicitly says that the methods
described therein work _only_ on "jailbroken" devices:
"To develop for the device, one should first obtain a provisioning
profile by joining the iPhone Developer Program (which costs $99).
However, some simple tricks can be used to make Xcode compile and
debug on jailbroken devices without provisioning profiles." [1]
This immediately precedes method 1. Method 2 references another
guide[2] whose requirements include "Jailbroken device". Method 3
includes the requirement "Device needs to be jailbroken". No more
methods are described.
Mark
[1] http://iphonedevwiki.net/index.php/Xcode
[2]
http://www.sysrage.net/guides/ios-programming/building-and-running-ios-applications-without-a-paid-developer-license
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, (continued)
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, chad, 2015/05/24
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/05/24
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Richard Stallman, 2015/05/25
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, chad, 2015/05/25
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Richard Stallman, 2015/05/26
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, chad, 2015/05/26
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Richard Stallman, 2015/05/27
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, chad, 2015/05/28
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Richard Stallman, 2015/05/28
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, chad, 2015/05/28
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, chad, 2015/05/30
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Richard Stallman, 2015/05/31
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/05/21
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/05/21
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Richard Stallman, 2015/05/20
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Vaidheeswaran C, 2015/05/30
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Rasmus, 2015/05/30
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Vaidheeswaran C, 2015/05/19
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/05/20
- Re: What would an "An Official" GNU Emacs Book look like?, David Engster, 2015/05/18