[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: string> missing?

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: string> missing?
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:24:44 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

I decided to define string< and not string> back when keeping Emacs
small was a major design goal.  Even one additional function was worth
avoiding.  I considered > so basic that it was worth adding, but
string> we could live without.

That goal no longer exists.  I see no harm in adding string> for
symmetry, now.
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]