[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package.el: soft dependencies?
From: |
Yuri D'Elia |
Subject: |
Re: package.el: soft dependencies? |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:03:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.0 |
On 14/07/15 23:52, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
>> But for optional dependencies you'd want to know what you get when
>> installing more stuff, also within the package manager. So there should
>> also be a one line summary of what the dependency adds (this is how pacman
>> works; I don't remember how verbose apt is).
>
> apt has no detail as of why a package is suggested, and it works well
> enough for me. Presenting the list briefly, as done for the requirements
> would do.
To be clear: not that I won't like a summary line, but I don't think
it's required at all to still be a great addition in usability.
Re: package.el: soft dependencies?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/07/15