[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p
From: |
Dmitri Paduchikh |
Subject: |
Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:39:40 +0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
SM> (interactive-p) is 99.9% equivalent to (called-interactively-p
SM> 'interactive), including interactions with advice and whatnot.
By the way, the interface of called-interactively-p seems somewhat
non-intuitive. Since calling it with 'interactive is intended to replace
`(interactive-p)' it would be more convenient to make `kind' an optional
argument having the default meaning of 'interactive.
(called-interactively-p) ; instead of 'interactive
(called-interactively-p 'ever) ; instead of 'any
Just a side note.
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, (continued)
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, raman, 2015/07/17
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, raman, 2015/07/17
- RE: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Drew Adams, 2015/07/17
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, raman, 2015/07/17
- RE: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Drew Adams, 2015/07/17
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Andreas Röhler, 2015/07/20
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Stefan Monnier, 2015/07/16
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, raman, 2015/07/17
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Stefan Monnier, 2015/07/17
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p,
Dmitri Paduchikh <=
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Andreas Röhler, 2015/07/20
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Stefan Monnier, 2015/07/20
Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, raman, 2015/07/18
Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Richard Stallman, 2015/07/12
Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/07/17