[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: need for 'dynamical-let'?

From: Dmitri Paduchikh
Subject: Re: need for 'dynamical-let'?
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 05:02:48 +0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> It seems that the situation with advices even worse than with macros. As
>> I understand it, the code of advice may be compiled at runtime but it is
>> unknown in what context compilation will be done.

SM> That's true for old-style `defadvice', but not for new-style
SM> `advice-add'.

Understood. Is it planned to obsolete `defadvice'?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]