Re: Supporting multiline Package-Requires header

[Artur Malabarba]

> I raise possibility (3)
>
> Package-Requires: ((pkg-a "4.2.0) (pkg-b "1.0))
>                   ((pkg-c "1.2))

I thought about this one too, but I don't like it much because (as you
mention) when someone messes up it will fail silently. Other than
that, it's viable.

Option also has the advantage that it's impossible to use by accident
(since the whole thing has to be a single valid sexp).