[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnutls tofu support? or even --insecure?
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: gnutls tofu support? or even --insecure? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:09:54 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:21:49 +0100 Nix <address@hidden> wrote:
N> On 11 Aug 2015, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen outgrape:
>> Well, the outcome was that the new network manager functionality would
>> replicate the tofu functionality in lisp and delegate only the
>> certificate checking to gnutls. But I lost track of what happened after
>> that; think the functionality was merged?
N> It was, but I'm still being asked about certs on every Emacs restart --
N> it doesn't seem to be remembering anything persistently.
I'm not asked, and certs are stored for me. Can you check the cert
storage?
#+begin_src text
% cat ~/.emacs.d/network-security.data
*[master]
(
(:id "sha1:f80ca63ad4bad106ae2a39e488272df8ddc4aaf8" :fingerprint
"sha1:44:b4:29:38:9c:0c:68:f0:00:13:37:f3:90:42:94:17:08:e0:93:10" :host
"letsencrypt.org:443")
...
)
#+end_src
N> It's clearly not the same as --tofu -- if gnutls doesn't like a
N> connection, it's not going to let you in, even if it connected perfectly
N> well to it in the past. This is true *no matter what* Emacs does -- I
N> don't see how you can possibly hope to replicate the 'connected fine
N> before, connect again without cert complaint or checking the cert chain'
N> without actually telling gnutls not to check the cert chain... which
N> this fault suggests is not happening.
I haven't experienced this issue myself, but maybe you can describe
the expected vs. actual behavior and how it can be improved in more
detail? I can't follow your text, sorry.
Ted