[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Sep 2015 22:19:26 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > > > We are asking for matches that disregard the diacriticals
> > > > (and in case of ª also higher-order collation-order variation).
> > >
> > > No. You are asking for that only when you use a search pattern
> > > that does not use the diacriticals. When you search with á in
> > > the pattern you are NOT asking for matches that disregard the
> > > diacriticals. And why not?
> >
> > Because á does include a diacritical. By specifying it, the user told
> > us the diacriticals are important, and shouldn't be disregarded.
>
> Again, you are just parroting what the implementation does
??? I explained the interpretation of the user input, how's that
implementation?
> Again, both options for fold matching should probably be available.
> There is no reason to hard-code one of them at design time.
>
> At least no reason has been put forth so far.
You've got all the reasons, you just refuse to hear them.
Time to bail out.
- char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/01
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/01
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Ulrich Mueller, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09