[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 02 Sep 2015 11:34:28 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Since it is possible to search for only 'รก', it would be nice to have
some convenient way to search only for 'a' with no accents.
The only convenient interface I can think of is that you type, in a
postfix input method, a ' DEL. Currently that is equivalent to typing
just a. But we could conceivably make it different.
Can someone think of some other interface for this?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/10
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Juri Linkov, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Ulrich Mueller, 2015/09/08
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2015/09/02
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/03
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/02
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2015/09/02
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/09/03
RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Nix, 2015/09/07