Re: Dynamic loading progress

[Daniel Colascione]

On 09/13/2015 06:04 AM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
> Daniel Colascione <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> schrieb
> am So., 15. Feb. 2015 um 21:21 Uhr:
> 
>       typedef struct emacs_value_tag* emacs_value;
> 
> 
> Would it make sense to not use a typedef here? Using a typedef means
> that the type including its size is opaque and subject to change, which
> can break ABI compatibility. I'd rather have something like:
> 
> struct emacs_value {
>   // contains private fields
> };
> 
> and then pass /struct emacs_value*/ around.

You may have missed the "*" in the typedef. The difference is stylistic.
There's no difference between foo and bar here.

typedef struct valuex* value;
void foo(struct valuex* x);
void bar(value y);

I find the typedef much more readable, however.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature