[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dynamic loading progress
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Dynamic loading progress |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Sep 2015 06:39:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
On 09/15/2015 06:33 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On 09/15/2015 01:45 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> So having our binary interfaces and calling conventions and
>>> memory/exception handling default to "like Emacs does" is not just
>>> Lisp-friendly but is also keeping our license enforcement options more
>>> conservative.
>>
>> I don't see how.
>
> Maybe you should have read more than a single paragraph then.
Maybe you shouldn't snip the part where I explain how the rest of your
argument is incorrect.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, (continued)
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/14
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Daniel Colascione, 2015/09/14
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/15
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, David Kastrup, 2015/09/15
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Daniel Colascione, 2015/09/15
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, David Kastrup, 2015/09/15
- Re: Dynamic loading progress,
Daniel Colascione <=
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, David Kastrup, 2015/09/15
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/15
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Michael Albinus, 2015/09/15
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Philipp Stephani, 2015/09/29
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/29
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/13
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Daniel Colascione, 2015/09/13
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/14
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Philipp Stephani, 2015/09/29
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/29