[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:15:28 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:10:12 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> > Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 12:27:46 -0400
> >
> > > But why does it have to be a separate command? Can't "C-u C-x v v",
> > > when it calls vc-checkin, present that header in the vc-log buffer, so
> > > that muscle memory doesn't have to change?
> >
> > Actually, removing this use of C-u is one of the main benefits, in my mind.
>
> Probably because you have no use for the feature in the first place.
And, btw, the removal of the capability to specify a revision didn't
remove the prefix argument, it just limited its meaning to specifying
a different back-end.
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, (continued)
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/19
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/19
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/19
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/19
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/19
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/21