[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New maintainer
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: New maintainer |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Oct 2015 18:32:23 +0100 |
(Back on the topic of new maintainers)
I only know John Wiegley by reputation and by code (both of which are
very good), but putting that together with the conversations on the
current topic, it looks to me like he would make a very good
maintainer.
I know Eli from many other topics on this list, and I also think he
would make a good addition to the maintainer team. My only concern
would be that the burn-out effect might cause him to cease
contributing. Eli is among our most active contributors and I shiver
in fear at the thought of losing his contributions.
Best,
Artur
- Re: New maintainer, (continued)
- Re: New maintainer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/10/11
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/15
- Re: New maintainer, Karl Fogel, 2015/10/09
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/09
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/09
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/09
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/09
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/10
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/09
- Re: New maintainer, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/11
- Re: New maintainer,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Jens K. Loewe, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Jens K. Loewe, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Jens K. Loewe, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/08