[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Branches are Scary
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Branches are Scary |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:28:22 +0200 |
> From: address@hidden (Phillip Lord)
> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:20:06 +0000
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> >> At the same time, if I am understanding things correctly, I can't squash
> >> and force feature and fix branches that I have pushed up, which means
> >> that these have to get deleted unmerged cause I squash and merge locally.
> >
> > It seems that *this* is the actual problem to solve. The rule of thumb
> > is simple: Do not squash or rebase any commits you have pushed out, it
> > makes life hard for everybody else, that's why it's not allowed in the
> > repository. If you still plan substantial cleanup of your commits, just
> > do not push them yet.
>
> Makes it hard to get comments on them, I think.
How's that? Can you tell more details how getting comments requires
squashing?
> Possibly, the solution is not to use the main emacs git for this
> form of collaboration, but to publish my own repo
That'd be less convenient, so I think we should avoid that as much as
possible.
> Clearly rebasing on a branch with many people are working on would be
> bad.
Why not merge instead? That's what I do, and I have yet to see a
single problem. What am I missing?
- Branches are Scary, Phillip Lord, 2015/12/17
- Re: Branches are Scary, Ingo Lohmar, 2015/12/17
- Re: Branches are Scary, Phillip Lord, 2015/12/17
- Re: Branches are Scary, John Wiegley, 2015/12/17
- Re: Branches are Scary,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Branches are Scary, Yuri Khan, 2015/12/18
- Re: Branches are Scary, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/18
- Re: Branches are Scary, Phillip Lord, 2015/12/18
- Re: Branches are Scary, Random832, 2015/12/18
- Re: Branches are Scary, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/18
- Re: Branches are Scary, Phillip Lord, 2015/12/18
Re: Branches are Scary, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/18