Re: tags-loop-continue

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 01/09/2016 11:49 PM, Dmitry Gutov wrote:

> If it's only supposed to be used in tags-query-replace and
> tags-query-replace now, why does it need a binding? It only seems to be
> used in a non-interactive way.

Sorry, "and tags-search".

> > Maybe we should rebind
> > xref-pop-marker-stack back to 'M-*' and leave tags-loop-continue on
> > 'M-,', WDYT?
>
> I disagree. As per above, its interactive form is basically obsolete,
> isn't it?

We can avoid this conundrum by defining a new, private function (say, 
tags--loop-continue), which will be non-interactive, and to which the 
now-obsolete tags-loop-continue will delegate to. And use it in 
tags-query-replace and tags-search.

WDYT?