[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should Glibc API be changed?
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: Should Glibc API be changed? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:40:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 |
On 01/19/2016 02:52 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> I have written to the Glibc maintainers to ask them to discuss this
> with John, but I think that a proposal for such a big incompatibility
> calls for a very broad discussion before any decisions are made.
Richard,
I'm disappointed you chose a private mailing list for the discussion.
This doesn't really match how glibc development proceeds today.
I'm puzzled why you think this is a major change. It only affects Emacs
and perhaps some unpublished (and therefore likely proprietary)
applications we know nothing about.
The research in the parent thread suggests that I was mistaken and Emacs
should compile just fine after removal of the API. And as I wrote in my
initial message, this was never about removal of the ABI, so existing
Emacs binaries will keep working.
Florian
Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Ali Bahrami, 2016/01/18
Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/18
Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Ken Raeburn, 2016/01/18