RE: find-file-project

[Drew Adams]

> >> But why do we care about that? Each backend author could invent their own
> >> "dispatchable" completion table (with cl-defstruct),
> >
> > That might break existing code which looks at minibuffer-completion-table.
> 
> Wouldn't that breakage be justifiable? It's a new kind of table, and we
> wouldn't want it to be used in a way it's not designed to.

Please do not break `minibuffer-completion-table' or its use.
I use it, including modifying it on the fly, during completion.