Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-derived-mode

[Leo Liu]

On 2016-03-01 09:24 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> That should at least give one example where adding (indent 3) hurts.

define-derived-mode is available since at least emacs 22.1 without any
(indent N) settings. I think maybe it is better to think in the other
direction that is what does (indent 3) bring to the table? is it worth
breaking 10 years of practice? Personally I have code that looks like
this:

 (define-derived-mode lcnt-mode special-mode nil :abbrev-table nil
   ...)

If you insist I'll append that example to the comment.

Thanks,
Leo