|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-derived-mode |
Date: | Mon, 07 Mar 2016 23:35:51 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
FWIW, I'm really sorry to have occasioned this longwinded bike-shedding. My *only* point was to ask to get some concrete example where the patch was undesirable, so that we know concretely why the change was undone. I did not intend to put in doubt the validity of the reversion. Stefan >>> That should at least give one example where adding (indent 3) hurts. >> define-derived-mode is available since at least emacs 22.1 without any >> (indent N) settings. I think maybe it is better to think in the other >> direction that is what does (indent 3) bring to the table? > That's irrelevant to the issue of having to documenting *why* you > revert something. > Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |