[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2016 21:00:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> `git notes' is a documented feature available since a long time ago. It
>> can turn the immutability of the commit log into a non-issue if you wish
>> to produce a proofread ChangeLog to include in the tarball.
>
> We need a more detailed proposal than this, TIA. David says "git
> notes" is not a solution; if notes don't support merging, then I tend
> to think he is right.
But they do support merging.
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, (continued)
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/03/07
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/03/07
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/03/07
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/07
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/03/07
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, David Engster, 2016/03/08
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/03/08
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, David Engster, 2016/03/08
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/03/08
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/08
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/07
- Code reviews (was: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs?), Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/07
- Re: Code reviews, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/03/07
- Re: Code reviews, Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/08
- Re: Code reviews, Phillip Lord, 2016/03/08
- Re: Code reviews, Yuri Khan, 2016/03/08
- Re: Code reviews, Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/08
- Re: Code reviews, Phillip Lord, 2016/03/09
- Re: Code reviews, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/08
- Re: Code reviews, Phillip Lord, 2016/03/09