[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Help etags parse lisp.j
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Help etags parse lisp.j |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:40:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> No, evidently because it wants to support K&R function definition:
How 'bout we add an option to etags whether or not to support
K&R definitions?
In my experience, supporting K&R is a nightmare with terrible
consequences, and nowadays it's sufficiently rarely used that it's OK to
relegate it to some optional behavior.
Stefan
- Help etags parse lisp.j, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/20
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Andreas Schwab, 2016/03/20
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/20
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/20
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Paul Eggert, 2016/03/21
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Andreas Schwab, 2016/03/21
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/21
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/22
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/22
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/21
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Paul Eggert, 2016/03/21
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/21
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, John Wiegley, 2016/03/21
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/22
- Re: Help etags parse lisp.j, Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/21