Re: Python interactive navigation around nested functions

[Andreas Röhler]

On 25.06.2016 01:23, Clément Pit--Claudel wrote:
> On 2016-06-24 18:10, Dima Kogan wrote:
> > Yeah, I'd rather not proliferate multiple similar-yet-slightly-different
> > behaviors, so I'll simply use my own python nav functions in my work if
> > this gets rejected.
> That would be too bad

Not that much, as it displays another basic strength of Emacs.
For me a major reason for preferring it over other tools, which might be 
smarter in detail.

> ;.I think you're making a good point; and still the frustrating part with a 
> python-specific fix is that C-M-a will have a different meaning depending on 
> the programming language :/

Nope. A function definition as displayed here is pretty comparable with 
its role in Emacs Lisp.
A case would be def/class distinction - which is not at stake.