[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Differences between Org-Mode and Hyperbole

From: Eric S Fraga
Subject: Re: Differences between Org-Mode and Hyperbole
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:23:06 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.90 (gnu/linux)

On Friday, 17 Jun 2016 at 05:02, Tom wrote:
> Robert Weiner <rsw <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Emacs should have excellent tools in these
>> areas.  Has anyone examined the org-mode code to see whether it is well
>> written or not?
> Org is an excellent, practical tool. That's why people use it.

Indeed.  Pragmatic approach.  It may be lacking in design, although much
has been rewritten over the years, more recently by Nicolas, but it
works and works very well.

It may consist of a number of distinct functionalities but the reality
is that actually being productive while working (writing text and code
while managing projects and emails) requires using many of these
distinct functionalities (export, babel, agenda, capture).  For me, org
provides a unifying experience that has enriched my emacs use (and I
speak as an emacs user from the 80s...).

Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]