[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:59:04 -0700 (PDT) |
> Any library complicated enough to have N `require's will by necessity
> have so many more lines of code than N that the longhand list of
> (require 'foo) will be negligible. Doing it the simple(minded), obvious
> way has the advantage that it makes trivial things like grep easier.
+1
(Also, it's more readable by humans, IMO.)
- Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?, Robert Weiner, 2016/06/29
- Re: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/06/29
- Re: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?, Robert Weiner, 2016/06/29
- Re: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?, Davis Herring, 2016/06/29
- RE: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?, Robert Weiner, 2016/06/29
- RE: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?, Drew Adams, 2016/06/29
- Re: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?, John Mastro, 2016/06/29
- RE: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?, Herring, Davis, 2016/06/29
- Re: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?, Robert Weiner, 2016/06/30
RE: Emacs 25.0.94: Is require failing to define macros and functions at compile time?, Drew Adams, 2016/06/29