Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:

> They have different purposes: (1) is to make tls.el, which uses command-line
> tunnels, more noisy by default, so users are led to the C bindings to GnuTLS
> (gnutls.el). (2) is to disable SSLv3 in tls.el. (3) is to change the
> variables in gnutls.el a bit to make customization and future work easier.
> (3) is the only risky one because it affects user customizations, but I
> think we have to bite that buller sooner or later.

OK. Does anyone else have a reason to object to these changes?

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2