Re: A few thoughts on seq.el

[Nicolas Petton]

Tino Calancha <address@hidden> writes:

> D) If the only dependence on 'cl-lib in seq.el is `cl-subseq',
>     Would be possible to include a func `seq-replace'
>     (stolen from `cl-replace') and then define `seq-subseq',
>     a stolen version of `cl-subseq' as well?
>
>     That would remove the 'cl-lib dependence, one of the
>     arguments to not load 'seq at Emacs start up, AFAIK.
>     Does it have any sense?

I take back what I previously said, I think it could make sense, even if
I generally don't like copy/pasting code.

Cheers,
Nico

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature