|
| From: | James Cloos |
| Subject: | Re: why is site-lisp placed before the default load path? |
| Date: | Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:35:04 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Having site-lisp first goes back probably as long as site-lisp has existed. It worked infinitely lot better before subdirectoried were automatically included. That is what broke things. (As I've complained before.) -JimC -- James Cloos <address@hidden> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |