Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining]

[Daniel Colascione]

On 08/29/2016 11:16 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 21:04:42 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> >
> > That single case of #1 is revert-buffer
>
> Btw: not every call to revert-buffer hits this case.  Quite the
> contrary: almost none of them do.  IOW, the situation where the
> before-change hook is not called at all is very rare even if you only
> consider the uses of revert-buffer.

I think we fundamentally disagree about how rarity affects bug important:

You: "This bug is rare. Cool. We don't have to worry about it much."
Me: "This bug is rare. That's awful. That means that people won't hit 
this bug until it causes some horrible, non-reproducible problem."