[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2)
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 01 Sep 2016 09:33:43 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Okay, yes, I understand now, and yes, this should be conservative, in
> the sense that it works for all changes, I guess. We are making the
> assumption here that "start" is always consistent between b-c-f and
> a-c-f,
No, we don't make such an assumption either. The assumption we make is
that the region passed to a-c-f is within the region passed to b-c-f
(i.e. is tighter).
Stefan