[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2)

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2)
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 09:33:43 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)

> Okay, yes, I understand now, and yes, this should be conservative, in
> the sense that it works for all changes, I guess. We are making the
> assumption here that "start" is always consistent between b-c-f and
> a-c-f,

No, we don't make such an assumption either.  The assumption we make is
that the region passed to a-c-f is within the region passed to b-c-f
(i.e. is tighter).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]