Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Tino Calancha <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:30:35 +0900 (JST)
> 
> > I believe Eli has proposed a solution that offers a middle ground. Can we 
> > move
> > to discussing that?
> Yes, we can talk about that.
> Eli suggestion would be consistent with Dired if, for instance:
> I) C-u * . el RET
> ;; unmark
> II) C-u C-u * . el RET
> ;; prompt for the marker char.

FWIW, I'm okay with this.

> I mean, we should not invert the number of C-u's in I) II)

Indeed, no need.

Thanks.