Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Alain Schneble <address@hidden>
> CC: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>,
>       <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:18 +0200
> 
> address@hidden (Phillip Lord) writes:
> 
> There's also d) where an elpa package would just go into it's
> corresponding directory under EMACS/lisp, e.g. EMACS/lisp/org if org is
> an elpa package.

That's what I'd prefer, yes.

> Of course, there's a chance of name clashes here, but both GNU Emacs
> and GNU elpa are under the same control IIUC.

Exactly, and so we can easily make sure that no name clashes happen.

Besides, such name clashes would be bad even if ELPA wasn't under our
control, since loading a package could then load an incorrect one,
depending on how load-path is ordered.