[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Helmut Eller |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Oct 2016 10:23:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, Oct 07 2016, Nikolay Kudryavtsev wrote:
> Is there even a reason to try evolving Elisp into something else?
A major pain point of Emacs Lisp is the lack of module system or other
namespace mechanism. The prefixes all over the place make Elisp code
quite verbose and ugly. Evolving Elisp into a language with a module
system would be a "good thing".
Helmut
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Lars Brinkhoff, 2016/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Helmut Eller <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nicolas Petton, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/11