Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added

[Phillip Lord]

John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>>> "PL" == Phillip Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> PL> All makes sense, but still a bit confused about how we would decide
> PL> whether a package would be tarball or core. What would the criteria be?
>
> Whatever the developers here decide. Someone will propose that a package be
> included, and we'll agree or disagree on each point.


That doesn't really answer the question:-)

I'm wondering on what basis we would make the distinction between core
and tarball. Potential usefulness, longevity, quality etc?

I'm not asking because I expect to have completely clear criteria at
this stage, but because I want to know that there are some criteria. If
there are not, then we may be making an unnecessary distinction.

Phil