[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency, again
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency, again |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:22:38 +0300 |
> From: Ken Raeburn <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 03:58:04 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> I collected some notes from those past discussions, though it was often
> unclear whether there was consensus on certain things being needed or whether
> they were just ideas being kicked around. My list, aside from the note to go
> back and review the discussions again :-) …
>
> * collapse systhread and thread, adding w32threads.c to emulate the pthread
> interface
This can be done later, it's not a critical issue, IMO.
> * header inclusion order requirement is weird; can generating one big header
> help?
I'm not sure I understand what inclusion order is being alluded to
here. Can you elaborate?
> * field names and faking globals with macros: maybe change m_ prefix, maybe
> add BVAR-like macro
Again, not critical.
> * one thread per terminal?
Why?
> * file notifications and such shouldn’t go through same queue as keyboard
> events
Why?
> * interaction of SIGCHLD handling and threads?
Details?
> * handle errors in lower-level routines like sys_cond_init
> * ns_select needs fixing
>
> There are also uses of jmp_buf in places that should be examined carefully,
> like stack overflow handling, keyboard.c:getcjmp, and image handling code.
I'd say, insert appropriate FIXME comments where these issues pop up,
and leave this for later, unless the solution is already known.
Thanks.
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), (continued)
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, joakim, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, SAKURAI Masashi, 2016/10/15
- Re: Concurrency, again, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/17
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/18
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/18
- Re: Concurrency, again,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/18
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/18
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/19
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/19
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/20
- RE: Concurrency, again, Herring, Davis, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Alan Third, 2016/10/18