Re: Any interest in a function like this to add to subr.el?

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 18.10.2016 23:34, John Wiegley wrote:
> > > > > > "DG" == Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden> writes:
>
> GD> Isn't this basically cl-sort, though?
>
> No.  cl-sort is (1) destructive and (2) does not guarantee calling the
> accessor only once per element.

You're right.

Then I agree that we want a function like that. We'd want a destructive 
version of it as well, though.