|
| From: | Paul Eggert |
| Subject: | Re: When should ralloc.c be used? |
| Date: | Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:37:36 -0700 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
that doesn't explain why we'd need to use ralloc in the mean time.
I suppose you're right that we don't need to; we could instead hack on Emacs to get it to work without ralloc on recent glibc. If someone wants to do that, great. I'd rather spend my own limited cycles on fixing the main problem, which is unexec.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |