[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency, again
From: |
Stefan Huchler |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency, again |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:04:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Philipp Stephani <address@hidden> writes:
> That might be the intention, but I expect the outcome will be that
> interest in alternative paradigms gets lost (unless such alternative
> paradigms would also be merged and be available in parallel).
In hope to bring the discussion further without knowing to much about
the topic, you talked about "in your experiment" so do you have some
sort of proof-of-concept code working with emacs?
Are you willing to invest much time in implementing your solution? It seems
to be similar to the commercial world, where people say "put your money
where your mouth is", just in this case "put your code where your mouth
is".
I think people would be more convinced if there is some commitment,
cause else you can formulate the nicest thing and nothing will happen.
I dont want to attack you but maybe help you to "sell" your idea better.
But maybe I get the situation wrong, just looks for me like thats the
major motivation why people now push for that mostly done solution
instead of pie in the sky?
- RE: Concurrency, again, (continued)
- RE: Concurrency, again, Herring, Davis, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Alan Third, 2016/10/18
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/19
- Re: Concurrency, again, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/18
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again,
Stefan Huchler <=
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/27
- Re: Concurrency, again, Daniel Colascione, 2016/10/27
- Re: Concurrency, again, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/10/27
- Re: Concurrency, again, Daniel Colascione, 2016/10/27
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/28
- Re: Concurrency, again, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/31
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/10/26