[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we go GTK-only?
From: |
Perry E. Metzger |
Subject: |
Re: Can we go GTK-only? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:15:02 -0400 |
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:32:14 -0700 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
wrote:
> Alternatively, how about if we change the GTK port to be more like
> the NS port? That is, we leave xterm.o, xfns.c, xselect.c etc.
> alone (except for removing the GTK-related parts), and have new
> source files gtkterm.c, gtkfns.c, gtkselect.c etc. as needed to
> support GTK. The GTK port would no longer define HAVE_X_WINDOWS.
> That way, the no-toolkit, Motif, and Athena configurations would
> still work, without getting in the way of GTK.
This seems like a good idea. Emacs already has multiple front ends.
Having a distinct GTK front end seems like a good, clean sort of
segregation. The legacy code can be left in and alone for now for the
benefit of those who use it.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger address@hidden
- Can we go GTK-only?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/10/27
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Frank Haun, 2016/10/27
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/27
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?,
Perry E. Metzger <=
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/27
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/28
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/28