[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: String interpolation
From: |
Clément Pit--Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: String interpolation |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Dec 2016 12:58:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
On 2016-12-10 11:01, Yuri Khan wrote:
> If this wasn’t Emacs, I would name lack of localizability as a
> drawback of including code as part of strings. But that’s moot because
> no one writes localizable software in Elisp.
It's an excellent point nonetheless; thanks for mentioning it!
(though part of me wonders if this wouldn't help with localizability, too:
assuming fmt was extended to support compile-time constants, I could imagine
that the ability to include code in strings may make translation easier)
Thanks for the insight!
Clément.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Yuri Khan, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation,
Clément Pit--Claudel <=
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Yuri Khan, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/11
Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/11
Re: RFC: String interpolation, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/11
Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/11
Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/12
Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/11
Re: RFC: String interpolation, Helmut Eller, 2016/12/11
Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/11