[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Dec 2016 20:45:47 +0200 |
> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 18:35:58 +0000
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
> How do you see that process-send-string special-cases unibyte strings?
>
> The send_process function has two branches, one for unibyte, one for
> multibyte.
That's not special-casing. That's polymorphism, if you like: Emacs
silently does TRT for both.
> We are miscommunicating. string-to-unibyte can only meaningfully be
> called on a pure-ASCII string, and for pure-ASCII strings 'length'
> will count bytes. So I see no need for 'byte-array-length' if its
> implementation is as you indicated.
>
> That depends on how you want to represent byte arrays/octet streams in Emacs.
> If you want to represent
> them using unibyte strings, then you indeed only need `length'. But some
> earlier messages sounded like you
> wanted to represent byte arrays either using unibyte strings or byte-only
> multibyte strings. In that case
> `string-to-unibyte' is necessary.
No, it's not. Multibyte strings that include raw bytes are converted
to single bytes when you encode them.
> Once you encoded the string, why do you need anything except calling
> process-send-string?
>
> The byte size should be added as a Content-length HTTP header. If
> url-request-data is a unibyte string, that's
> not a problem (except for the newline conversion behavior in send_string),
> you can just use `length'. But if it's
> a multibyte string, you need to encode first to find the byte length.
I thought we've just agreed that multibyte strings there should not be
allowed.
- Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, (continued)
- Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/02
- Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/12/02
- Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/03
- Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/03
- Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/03
- Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/03
- Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, Andreas Schwab, 2016/12/03
Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/28
Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/28
Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el, Philipp Stephani, 2016/12/28