[OT] What's wrong with Gnus citations?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stephen Leake <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:35:33 -0600
> 
> John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >>>>>> "SL" == Stephen Leake <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > LS> For the foreseeable future, CEDET belongs in core.

John, why does Gnus reverse "SL" as if it were some RTL script?

This is not the first time I see this; here's another, even more
hilarious, example:

> >>>>> "DG" == Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> GD> One normally adds an alternative source of truth (i.e. a "cache") to fix a
> DG> significant performance problem, when one really can't do so otherwise.
> 
> DG> It seems we agree now that comment-cache's existence can't be justified by
> GD> performance considerations.
> 
> DG> Cache invalidation is a known hard problem in CS, so we generally don't
> GD> want to have extra caches.

Is this some fun feature?  If so, someone might find it not very
funny.