[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Continuous integration
From: |
Phillip Lord |
Subject: |
Re: Continuous integration |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:48:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> with Git. It also has no support for code review or pull/merge requests.
>
> Gitlab-CI doesn't have code review or pull/merge requests either, does it?
>
>> Finally, I don't think using GitLab precludes Hydra or any other CI
>> system.
>
> AFAIU, the current discussion is not about Gitlab but about CI systems
> (including Gitlab-CI).
Even as it stands, gitlab-ci would support pull/merge requests better
than hydra because it should build the branches for us. At the moment,
hydra is limited to emacs-25 and master. It's not possible for a
developer to schedule a clean build at the moment. Achieving this would
be a good thing I think.
Phil
- Re: Continuous integration, (continued)
- Re: Continuous integration, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/04/06
- Re: Continuous integration, Toon Claes, 2017/04/06
- Re: Continuous integration, Richard Stallman, 2017/04/07
- Re: Continuous integration, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/04/09
- Re: Continuous integration, Glenn Morris, 2017/04/09
- Re: Continuous integration, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/04/09
- Re: Continuous integration, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/04/11
- Re: Continuous integration, Stefan Monnier, 2017/04/11
- Re: Continuous integration, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/04/11
- Re: Continuous integration, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/04/11
- Re: Continuous integration,
Phillip Lord <=
Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/04/07
Re: Continuous integration, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/04/11