Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 6354e3c: Handle indentation of nested ternary operators in JS

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 13.04.2017 22:24, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > +  isSet
> > +    ? (isEmpty ? 2 : 3)
> > +    : 4
>
> Not sure about JS, but at least in C, those parentheses are not needed
> (so the indentation code should ideally DTRT even in the absence of
> parentheses).

You're right, it's the same in JS. Luckily, most programmers don't feel 
comfortable leaving the inner group without parentheses (so the reporter 
went away satisfied).

Not exactly sure what logic to use to support the paren-less case, so 
patch welcome!