[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: C++ qualified method names

From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: Re: C++ qualified method names
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 10:21:01 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

Hello, Eli.

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:39:00 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> In the C++ method below:

>   void
>   regcache::raw_supply_integer (int foo)
>   {
>     whatever (foo);
>   }

> invoking "M-: (c-defun-name) RET" produces "raw_supply_integer".  Why
> does it exclude the class qualification?  Is there a way to have that
> included?  This is important e.g. when producing a ChangeLog entry for
> such methods.

Please try the following: it has the disadvantage that it doesn't strip
WS when somebody writes the declaration as "regcache :: \n
raw_supply_integer".  But it should work in the vast majority of cases.

diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el b/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el
index a5ddcb4b92..9c0798e752 100644
--- a/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el
+++ b/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el
@@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ c-defun-name
              (setq name-end (point))
-             (c-backward-token-2)
+             (c-back-over-compound-identifier)
              (buffer-substring-no-properties (point) name-end)))))))))
 (defun c-declaration-limits (near)

Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]