[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?

From: Marcin Borkowski
Subject: Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 06:08:24 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50

On 2017-05-23, at 04:55, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:

> Just replace it with 2 different spellings dispatched by the number.

I guess you are aware that 2 different spellings are not enough for
certain languages...?

In Polish:

0 pakietów
1 pakiet
2, 3, 4 pakiety
5, 6, ..., 21 pakietów
22, 23, 24 pakiety

Good luck with l10n.

(I do not want to discourage work on it.  But I'm afraid it's more
difficult than many people think...  OTOH, if a reasonable
infrastructure is introduced in Emacs, I might be tempted to provide
some translations for Polish.)


Marcin Borkowski

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]