[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: html manual +css
From: |
Jean-Christophe Helary |
Subject: |
Re: html manual +css |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Jun 2017 23:45:30 +0900 |
> On Jun 2, 2017, at 23:28, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2017 06:49 AM, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
>> The css file that's used for the web version of the HTML manuals is really
>> nice. Especially in the Elisp Manual where the code is much more readable.
>>
>> Is it OK to use the same (or a similar) file for the local HTML manuals?
>
> I don't see why not. It is odd that the versions differ.
Regarding the texi code, I'm seeing @smallexample and @example that are not
relate to the actual size of the code but @smallexample as an HTML class is not
associated with the brown background while @example is.
For ex. compare the code at the end of section 36.4 (@smallexample, 12 lines)
to the code at the beginning of section 37.3 (@example, 3 lines).
So either we modify the CSS to add @smallexample as a class that receives the
same background as @example (trivial and really fast), or we go through the
whole texi file set and remove all instances of @smallexample (trivial too but
longer)...
Jean-Christophe
- html manual +css, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/06/02
- Re: html manual +css, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/02
- Re: html manual +css,
Jean-Christophe Helary <=
- Re: html manual +css, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/06/02
- Re: html manual +css, Yuri Khan, 2017/06/02
- Re: html manual +css, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/02
- Re: html manual +css, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/06/02
- Re: html manual +css, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/06/05
- Re: html manual +css, Richard Stallman, 2017/06/06
- Re: html manual +css, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/06/06
- Re: html manual +css, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/06/07