[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lm-verify, long copyright line
From: |
Mike Kupfer |
Subject: |
Re: lm-verify, long copyright line |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:16:49 -0700 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I suppose someone should change either
> lm-verify or Gnulib to fix the incompatibility between the two
> approaches.
The change to Gnulib is a one-liner:
--- update-copyright~ 2017-06-22 17:16:28.604027480 -0700
+++ update-copyright 2017-06-24 15:08:43.626795139 -0700
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@
|| ($stmt =~ s/^([\S]+)(?: |$)//))
{
my $line = $1;
- $stmt_wrapped .= $stmt_wrapped ? "$eol$prefix" : $leading;
+ $stmt_wrapped .= $stmt_wrapped ? "$eol$prefix " : $leading;
$stmt_wrapped .= $line;
}
else
I guess the question is how likely would this be to introduce a new set
of problems.
mike
- lm-verify, long copyright line, Mike Kupfer, 2017/06/22
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/22
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Mike Kupfer, 2017/06/22
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/22
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Mike Kupfer, 2017/06/22
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/23
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Stefan Monnier, 2017/06/23
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/23
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Glenn Morris, 2017/06/23
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/23
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line,
Mike Kupfer <=
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/24
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Mike Kupfer, 2017/06/24
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Stefan Monnier, 2017/06/25
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Mike Kupfer, 2017/06/25
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/25
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Mike Kupfer, 2017/06/25
- Re: lm-verify, long copyright line, Paul Eggert, 2017/06/25